%2BCL11%2B204-Pin%2BSODIMM%2BMemory%2Bfor%2BMac%2BCT2K4G3S160BM.jpg )
Laptop Ram 1.5V Notebook Memory CT102464BF160B
Laptop Ram 1.5V Notebook Memory CT102464BF160B
Crucial 8GB Single DDR3 1600 MT/s (PC3-12800) CL11 SODIMM 204-Pin 1.35V/1.5V Notebook Memory CT102464BF160BCrucial 8GB Single DDR3 1600 MT/s (PC3-12800) CL11 SODIMM 204-Pin 1.35V/1.5V Notebook Memory CT102464BF160B
I purchased the Crucial CT2K8G3S160BM 2x8GB to
increase the memory in my Lenovo Y410P laptop from 8-GB to 16-GB. My
Y410P has two memory slots, and one slot was already occupied by a
factory-installed Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 8-GB memory card. I probably
could have just added another 8-GB card. But to avoid any possible
memory glitches, I prefer not to mix-and-match memory cards of different
types. The existing Samsung memory was PC3L/DDR3L, with the 'L'
signifying that it is low-voltage 1.35V memory, whereas the standard
PC3/DDR3 memory uses a higher voltage of 1.50V. You should not combine
memory of different voltages or use memory with incorrect voltage since
your laptop may not even boot up. To further maximize compatibility
with my laptop, since it came equipped with CL11 1600-MHz memory, I
likewise wanted to stick with CL11 CAS Latency speed, instead of going
for memory with a faster (lower) CL rating. Some CL9 memory cards have
faster specifications, but I really think that most people will not
notice 2-nanoseconds of extra latency. So I ordered this CL11 1600-MHz
memory because I wanted to exactly match the specifications of my
laptop's original 8-GB memory card to ensure compatibility since using
mismatched memory can cause system instability. And this memory has
been working flawlessly in my laptop!
In real-world applications benchmarks, there is barely any difference between using CL11 memory and using some fancier CL9 memory, and the unnoticeable speed difference is not worth paying extra money for more-expensive models of CL9 or faster memory. With most applications, if you compare CL7, CL9, and CL11 application benchmarks, the differences mostly amount to 2% to 4% differences in benchmark timings.
In real-world applications benchmarks, there is barely any difference between using CL11 memory and using some fancier CL9 memory, and the unnoticeable speed difference is not worth paying extra money for more-expensive models of CL9 or faster memory. With most applications, if you compare CL7, CL9, and CL11 application benchmarks, the differences mostly amount to 2% to 4% differences in benchmark timings.
No comments:
Post a Comment